![]() | ![]() | |||
Hockey
HOME BASEBALL OTHER FEEDBACK RULES RANKINGS HISTORY TEAMS Teams with asterisks are not yet posted Abbotsford Canucks Adirondack Thunder Allen Americans Atlanta Gladiators Bakersfield Condors Belleville Senators Birmingham Bulls Bloomington Bison Bridgeport Islanders Calgary Wranglers Charlotte Checkers Chicago Wolves Cincinnati Cyclones Cleveland Monsters Coachella Valley Firebirds Colorado Eagles Evansville Thunderbolts Fayetteville Marksmen Florida Everblades Fort Wayne Komets Grand Rapids Griffins Greenville Swamp Rabbits Hartford Wolf Pack Henderson Silver Knights Hershey Bears Huntsville Havoc Idaho Steelheads Indy Fuel Iowa Heartlanders Iowa Wild Jacksonville Icemen Kalamazoo Wings Kansas City Mavericks Knoxville Ice Bears Lehigh Valley Phantoms Lions de Trois-Rivières Macon Mayhem Maine Mariners Manitoba Moose Milwaukee Admirals Newfoundland Growlers Norfolk Admirals Ontario Reign Orlando Solar Bears Pensacola Ice Flyers Peoria Rivermen Providence Bruins Quad City Storm Rapid City Rush Reading Royals Roanoke Rail Yard Dawgs Rochester Americans Rocket de Laval Rockford IceHogs San Diego Gulls San Jose Barracuda Savannah Ghost Pirates South Carolina Stingrays Springfield Thunderbirds Syracuse Crunch Tahoe Knight Monsters Texas Stars Toledo Walleye Toronto Marlies Tucson Roadrunners Tulsa Oilers Utah Grizzlies Utica Comets Wheeling Nailers Wichita Thunder Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins Worcester Railers |
Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here. Posted 2003 January 21 Revised 2009 March 22 This page has been bugging me for a while, and since I don't have any current teams to review, I'll just take the opportunity to fix it. See, when I first wrote this review, I commented that I wouldn't have anything to write about had I not discovered that there is a women's football (i.e., soccer) team in Reading England which is also called the Reading Royals. There was just one little problem, which is that the only reason there was a women's team with that name is that they were affiliated with the men's football team called the Reading Royals. Furthermore, the women's team is now Reading FC Women. So even if the joke I made about fans of Johnstown, Trenton, etc. making posters comparing the hockey players in Reading to women playing soccer made sense once upon a time, it definitely doesn't today. Oh well — live and learn, right? But as previously noted, the earlier version of the review said I wouldn't have anything to write about had I not discovered there is a women's team with that name. And now I've discovered there isn't. This puts me back in the situation of having nothing to say about this team and logo. The logos I have a lot to say about are the bad ones. But this one is pretty good. Sure, if I wanted I could harp on the absurdity of a purple lion the way I harped on the absurdity of the all-green mallard that was once used by the Quad City Mallards, but the Royals clearly don't intend this to be an accurate representation. The crown on the lion's head is another potential target, but it ties the "king of the jungle" theme to the name quite nicely. And given that whole "king of the jungle" bit and the fact that a lion appears in the British royal coat of arms, I can't even fairly accuse them of using an irrelevant feature in their logo. Okay, I admit that the issue of fairness doesn't always stop me, but this time I just don't want to. All in all, I'm more than willing to give them a pass. This is the sort of logo I want other teams to start making, so I'm not going to rag on them just to have something to say. I'll just say that it's a very good logo and leave it at that.
Final Score: -3 points.
This page Copyright ©2003-2009 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved
|