![]() | ![]() | |||
Hockey
HOME BASEBALL OTHER FEEDBACK RULES RANKINGS HISTORY TEAMS Teams with asterisks are not yet posted Abbotsford Canucks Adirondack Thunder Allen Americans Atlanta Gladiators Bakersfield Condors Belleville Senators Birmingham Bulls Bloomington Bison Bridgeport Islanders Calgary Wranglers Charlotte Checkers Chicago Wolves Cincinnati Cyclones Cleveland Monsters Coachella Valley Firebirds Colorado Eagles Evansville Thunderbolts Fayetteville Marksmen Florida Everblades Fort Wayne Komets Grand Rapids Griffins Greenville Swamp Rabbits Hartford Wolf Pack Henderson Silver Knights Hershey Bears Huntsville Havoc Idaho Steelheads Indy Fuel Iowa Heartlanders Iowa Wild Jacksonville Icemen Kalamazoo Wings Kansas City Mavericks Knoxville Ice Bears Lehigh Valley Phantoms Lions de Trois-Rivières Macon Mayhem Maine Mariners Manitoba Moose Milwaukee Admirals Newfoundland Growlers Norfolk Admirals Ontario Reign Orlando Solar Bears Pensacola Ice Flyers Peoria Rivermen Providence Bruins Quad City Storm Rapid City Rush Reading Royals Roanoke Rail Yard Dawgs Rochester Americans Rocket de Laval Rockford IceHogs San Diego Gulls San Jose Barracuda Savannah Ghost Pirates South Carolina Stingrays Springfield Thunderbirds Syracuse Crunch Tahoe Knight Monsters Texas Stars Toledo Walleye Toronto Marlies Tucson Roadrunners Tulsa Oilers Utah Grizzlies Utica Comets Wheeling Nailers Wichita Thunder Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins Worcester Railers |
Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here. Posted 2005 March 17 When you think about it, the irony is almost overhwleming. All across the continent, you have minor league hockey teams sticking bears in their logos despite the fact that there's no justifiable reason for it. And here we have a minor league team whose right to put a bear in their logo is as unquestionable as it comes…and they don't do it. The reason is obvious: they're the affiliate for one of the original six teams, and want to trade on that team's history. I really can't blame them. But I'm still amused by it. The logo, I have to say, doesn't work too well. I've always been very fond of the Boston Bruins logo. It's so simple that it qualifies for iconic status. But replacing the "B" with a "P" knocks the balance off. (This is exacerbated by the fact that the middle crossbar is well below the horizontal yellow line in this logo; in the Boston Bruins logo, the two are on the same level.) I understand the Providence Bruins probably wanted to have at least some kind of identity separate from the Boston Bruins, but this wasn't the way to do it. Simply put, it doesn't look right. They should have kept the "B" – it's not like anyone is sure whether the one in Boston's logo stands for "Boston" or "Bruins" in the first place. That being said, I'm not going to complain. After all, look at what the Binghamton Senators came up with when they decided to make a new logo. I'll definitely take this minor variation over something ridiculous like what the Charlotte Checkers have done, even if is considerably less than perfect.
Final Score: 5 points.
This page Copyright ©2005 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved
|